21 October 1996

Dear DAPTF Central Division Members:

The main focus of this letter is to summarize the proceedings of the 3rd meeting of the US Central Division Working Group of the Declining Amphibian Populations Task Force.

 

Summary of 3rd Meeting

Thirty-one people attended the 3rd Meeting of the US Central Division Working Group at Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore in northwest Indiana on 14-15 September 1996. Eight talks were presented that covered a variety of amphibian conservation issues. After the paper session the group discussed issues including: whether we want to include advocacy and activism in our mission, the North American Amphibian Monitoring Program protocols, and whether we are ready to launch a Division-wide monitoring program. What follows is a brief summary of the meeting.

Announcement of the Central Division homepage on the World Wide Web
Any items pertaining to amphibian conservation in the Central Division that you would like posted can be sent to Chris Phillips. It was suggested that the names and addresses of the Central Division members should be posted to the homepage. If you do not wish to have your name listed, notify Chris Phillips as soon as possible. The URL is http://www.inhs.uiuc.edu/cbd/main/collections/herp_links/DAPTFCentralUS.html

Advocacy and Activism
The possibility of including these activities in our mission was discussed. The feeling of the group was that such activities could undermine our scientific credibility and that we should advertise our expertise rather than our opinions. Each member should make the appropriate educational and regulatory agencies in their community aware that members of the DAPTF are available for advice or comment on issues related to amphibian populations, especially wetland issues. Examples of regulatory agencies that should be aware of our expertise include: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, State Departments of Conservation/Natural Resources, and local zoning boards and planning commissions. Educational groups include: your local school district, your local park district, Audubon Society, and other clubs and organizations with an interest in natural history.

The North American Amphibian Monitoring Program (NAAMP) Protocols
Five specific protocols for monitoring amphibian populations have been written by scientists from all over North America and formally presented to the scientific community for scrutiny. The protocols are: Terrestrial Salamander Surveys, Anuran Calling Surveys, Aquatic Surveys, Western Surveys, and Amphibian Atlassing. Because the anuran calling protocols are closest to implementation, we spent most of our time discussing the validity of the methods and how the Central Division would be involved in their implementation. After vigorous discussion, the majority opinion was that, while the methods were statistically sound, most of the call routes in the Central Division would involve extremely marginal habitat such as drainage ditches. The group did not feel that we could commit our limited resources to such an endeavor. We decided that anuran calling surveys should be carried out in the Central Division but that each state's Department of Conservation/Natural Resources should take the lead. We identified an agency representative in each of the five states who would be the most appropriate point of contact for the NBS group that is coordinating the anuran calling effort. The Central Division of the DAPTF could provide scientific advice and volunteers.

Division-wide Monitoring Programs
With the decision not to organize and lead the anuran calling surveys, the group turned to the question of what Division-wide monitoring program(s) would we organize and implement? We decided to put our efforts into an Atlassing project. Two levels of coverage were discussed. The first involves a small number (5 per state) of non-randomly chosen sites that have long-term protection and ideally, a history of amphibian monitoring. Eighteen such sites were identified at the 1994 Central Division meeting. The second would be the more traditional coverage where the area of concern (the Central Division in this case) is divided into large blocks (counties or degree blocks) and each is searched over a period of years. The main issues we identified were how to control for differences in effort and skill level among the various field personnel. No clear solutions to these problems were identified but the group agreed that these were issues that must be dealt with before any Atlassing project could be launched. The first step was identified as establishing communication with other groups who are either currently engaged in Atlassing or who are considering it.

If anyone would like to take the lead in directing the Central Division's Atlassing efforts, please drop me a line.

Finally, I would like to thank all those who participated in the meeting, especially Mike Lannoo who cooked and provided moral support. Special thanks to the folks at the Indian Dunes National Lakeshore; John Kwilosz our host and Ralph Grundel who set it all up.

Sincerely,

Chris Phillips
Central Division US DAPTF Coordinator