Effects of Excluding
Birds on Illinois Prairies
Birds are conspicuous members of grassland ecosystems, as
anyone entranced by the acrobatic and vocal territorial displays
of Bobolinks can attest. However, the question remains, Do
birds play any sort of significant ecological roles in grasslands?
Existing data are contradictory. For example, based on their
contribution to annual productivity (production of offspring,
expenditure of energy, etc.) in shrub-steppe (shrubby grassland),
ecologist John Wiens speculated that birds may be little more
than "frills" in the ecosystem, not interacting with it in
any particular way.
In contrast, several studies have found that grassland birds
can significantly reduce the numbers of grasshoppers. Because
grasshoppers can be abundant and voracious herbivores, their
suppression has the potential to free grassland plant species
from a major loss of photosynthetic tissue, which in turn
may allow plants to increase their own annual productivity.
This potential increased productivity may support a greater
abundance and diversity of animals that ultimately depend
upon primary production.
To address this issue, colleagues from the University of
Illinois at Chicago and I set up an experiment in an ongoing
prairie restoration experiment conducted at The Morton Arboretum
in Lisle, IL. The original experiment was designed to look
for effects of avian and mammalian granivores on initial prairie
restoration establishment (effects of both birds and mammals
were found). The main focus now is on how mammalian herbivores
(voles) affect community composition and productivity.
In our experiment, we erected bird exclosure cages within
the replicated prairie restoration plots. The cages are constructed
with half-inch-diameter rebar, PVC plumbing pipe, and monofilament
nylon gill netting. The mesh of the netting is large enough
for virtually all insects to access the interior of the cage,
but it is small enough to exclude birds. If birds significantly
reduce the numbers of insects, then presumably herbivory should
be of greater magnitude inside of cages than in comparable
control areas outside of cages. If this is the case, then
it is also possible that plants outside of cages will experience
decreased insect herbivory, and in turn may experience elevated
productivities.
| 
|
To sample insects, we collected them with a gas-powered vacuum
eight times during the growing season of 2001, with usually
about two or three weeks separating collection dates. Insects
were identified to Order (e.g., Orthoptera), counted, and
returned to the site of capture. To sample herbivory and its
potential effect on plant productivity, we examined all the
stem leaves on individual plants of the species stiff goldenrod
that were both inside and outside the cages. In addition to
estimating loss of leaf tissue on each stem leaf of each stem
of each individual, all flower heads were counted. Later,
randomly selected flower heads will be collected and seed
mass estimated.
Although the data have not yet been analyzed, several tantalizing
findings seem apparent. First, on some sampling dates, but
not others, more insects appeared to be captured inside than
outside the cages. If this is so, it suggests that the effects
of birds on insect population abundances may blink on and
off during the growing season (this was also found in a similar
experiment conducted in an oak forest in Missouri). Second,
we found that the composition of the insect community could
vary considerably between consecutive sampling periods separated
by only two weeks. The changing insect community composition
could be both a consequence and the cause of the variable
bird effect. Third, although not insects, spiders were collected
and counted. Spiders, which along with birds are also insect
predators, usually appeared more numerous within cages. So
when insect numbers were greater within cages, this is despite
what appears to be increased spider predation within cages.
If all of these impressions hold, our conclusion will be that
birds, despite having low annual productivities themselves,
are certainly more than just frills in these experimental
communities.
Christopher J. Whelan, Center for Biodiversity
Please report any problems with or suggestions about this
page to:
inhspubs@mail.inhs.uiuc.edu
|